Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Categories
- 6.2K All Categories
- 4 General
- 26 E&A Developer Blog (E&A Dev Speak)
- 6.4K Empires & Allies
- 2.1K General Conversation
- 297 Announcements & Updates
- 73 Exclusive Contests
- 278 New to Empires & Allies
- 1.9K Ideas & Feature Requests
- 167 The War room
- 1.3K Troubleshooting
- 112 Multimedia (Videos, Photos and Audio)
quickmatch matchmaking
Ollympo
Posts: 7Registered User, Facebook Connect User Loose Cannon
Why is it that after upgrading the HQ the next quickmatch starts showing guys with 3 and 4 levels above my HQ?
Worst is that I attack one higher than me I lose more medals that I win IF I win.
If I am to attack a higher lv HQ I think I deserve to get more medals in case of victory and lose less in case of defeat
Tagged:
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Because zynga doesn't care about miss matches between Hq levels or even player levels. We are merely matched by medal count. Its a deeply flawed and heavily manipulated system.
Since medals can be manipulated, but Stars can't that a combination of stars and HQ level could make a better matching system - maybe a multiplication to account for high HQ that is bought with gold vs won by battles
Yes ! I think a combo of stars and HQ level would be a better matchmaking system. I do not think a distinction between gold vs won by battles would work. If you choose to advance by buying gold so be it! It is more fun earning your way and easier on the pocket!
The way it is concerning match-ups I just choose to battle everyone in quick matches. I just do not engage the big miss-matches ! That way I save OIL and it balances my medal count! I gave up worrying about victories and defeats. So be it!